Animal-free "cheese" has arrived in the cheese aisle at a French supermarket

From Vox:

“Animal agriculture accounts for around 15 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions — yet lawmakers largely ignore it when crafting policy to combat climate change.”

“That neglect extends to the food industry more broadly, which for a long time has paid even less attention to its emissions than the energy or transport sectors. But as big fast food chains, grocers, and food manufacturers roll out sustainability plans, some are specifically committing to increasing and promoting their plant-based offerings, which are much less carbon-intensive than conventional meat and dairy products.”

Here come the big guns:

“Panera Bread kicked things off two years ago when it announced in January 2020 that it would make half of its menu plant-based in several years, up from 25 percent vegetarian at the time. Earlier this month, Burger King UK went a step further by announcing a plan to make its menu 50 percent plant-based by 2030 as a way to achieve its goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 41 percent by 2030. And this week, McDonald’s announced plans to trial its McPlant burger made with Beyond Meat in 600 San Francisco and Dallas-Fort Worth area locations starting February 14.”

KFC too has plant-based “chicken” rolling out currently in the US which apparently tastes terrifyingly like chicken, but the texture is still a bit different.

In the end, the goal (for sentient life to continue on the planet) is to have animal production and sales decrease gradually:

“While it’s hard to imagine governments taking bold action in the near future — if ever — to reduce meat and dairy production, there are rumblings. The Dutch government has introduced a $28.3 billion, 13-year proposal to pay farmers to stop raising animals, raise fewer animals, or relocate their herds, all in an effort to reduce animal manure pollution by reducing the number of pigs, chickens, and cows by a third. Several governments have even entertained imposing a meat tax, though the politics of that are extremely challenging.”

I’ll bet.

An intermediate strategy:

“One intermediate strategy grocers and other food companies could use to increase plant-based purchasing — given they’re not likely to reduce animal product availability anytime soon, if ever — is what Pyett calls “choice architecture,” or changing the environments where people eat and purchase foods.”

One example: In France, at Monoprix supermarkets, there are at least two brands of grated non-cheese cheese that have been slipped right in to the middle of the extremely long cheese aisle recently. One is “mozzarella” and the other is “cheddar”.

The former is the exact colour and consistency of cheap emmental. This is not exactly a high standard for cheese, but I’d bet you’d not realise it wasn’t cheap-n-cheerful emmental unless someone told you. It smells like cheese too. Have yet to melt it yet to see what happens.

Will try the cheddar next.

The most surprising thing with these two non-cheese cheeses was that they were cheaper than nearly all of the cheeses around them. No vegetarian/vegan “mark-up”, which tends to be how things go in big supermarkets.

Be brave, test one, and get back to me!

[Cover photo credit: Angela Weiss/AFP via Getty Images]

I think we all agree it's time for some train news! Bumper Christmas edition

it’s December in Europe.

In fact it’s December everywhere. But what does December in Europe mean?

Christmas?

Nope! it’s when the next twelve months’ train timetables kick in with a bang!

And truly, this year, they’re a sight for sore eyes!

Lots of juicy titbits from the Oui au Train de Nuit mailing list in France:

  • The night train from Paris to Tarbes and Lourdes (southern France) is back on track since yesterday evening!

  • The new Paris — Vienna night train kicks off tomorrow! It trundles via Strasbourg and Munich

  • After 9 months of track works, the Paris — Briançon (South-eastern France, Citadel, Ski-ing) kicked off again last night too. With renovated couchette cars! This is Briançon:

  • The Paris — Portbou (Spanish border) night train has a new stop at Narbonne (to pick up rugby players and fans of Marine Le Pencil)

  • A new shower zone has been inaugurated at Paris Austerlitz station, perfect for giving yourself a deep clean after your night train pulls in and before you have to rush off to work

  • The recently returned Paris — Nice night train is totally killing it, with an average of over 90% occupancy over the last few months. You make money when your train is 90% full.

  • Poland’s PKP train company is looking at bringing back the Paris — Warsaw night train in the next two years! Totally awesome, dude. This plus European Sleeper (of which I am a shareholder) is considering bringing in a Warsaw — Brussels — Ostend (Belgian seaside) night train too

  • Italy has ordered 70 new night train wagons for its trains that go to Sicily (involving rolling the train onto a ferry between the mainland and the island!)

  • The Berlin to Malmö (Sweden) night train has been up and running since summer, and has now been extended to Stockholm

  • Norway is looking at an Oslo — Copenhagen night train for around 2024 (the day train currently takes around 8 hours, i.e., most of a day)

  • The private Czech operator RegioJet is looking at a Berlin — Ljubljana — Zagreb for the end of next year! They’re also looking at Krakow — Zagreb.

It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see that it’s Go Gadget Arms! again with night trains in Europe.

C’est fantastique!

I'm not the only person to be blown away by this book

The way I see it, there is your life on Earth before reading The Overstory by Richard Powers.

And there is your life after it.

Mind a little blown.

But don’t take my word for it. Take Emma Thompson’s:

“The best book I’ve read in 10 years. It’s a remarkable piece of literature, and the moment it speaks to is climate change. So, for me, it’s a lodestone. It’s a mind-opening fiction, and it connects us all in a very positive way to the things that we have to do if we want to regain our planet.”

Or some dude called Barack:

“It’s about trees and the relationship of humans to trees. And it’s not something I would have immediately thought of, but a friend gave it to me. And I started reading it, and it changed how I thought about the Earth and our place in it.”

Ok. Right. Here we go.

Have you ever tried to read Moby Dick?

I have.

Overwhelming; frustrating; mind-blowing; insane; all of that and more, on an epic scale.

Well, The Overstory is kind of the same.

It’s to trees what Moby Dick is to whales. It isn’t exactly about trees, just like Moby Dick isn’t exactly about whales.

Both of them are about us in the end: humans; our place on Earth; our hopes and fears; our suicidal attempts to defeat nature.

Fun times, right?!

I’m not going to lie, the first hundred pages or so of The Overstory are a little bit like:

“What the actual fuck am I reading?”

That’s not an Obama quote, just to be clear.

It helps to think of this book like one of those films that starts off with a few apparently unrelated stories that gradually all connect up together while you sit there, chomping popcorn, blurting out “Aha!” or “Oh my god!” at the screen.

I’m itching to say more about this book, but seriously, if you have even the tiniest tiniest urge to better understand your own life, your position in the great scheme of things, then this is definitely the book for you.

And if you have even the slightest question about where humanity is heading, this is—of course—also the book for you.

If you’re like me, it won’t be long before you’re telling friends about the common ancestor of humans and trees, about all the genes we still share with trees even now; mad stuff like that.

Just get it already, or ask for it for Christmas!

Factory farmed chickens in New Zealand - and alternatives!

A small step for a chickens, a minor leap for humans—from RNZ:

“Domino's says fast food brands in NZ risk falling behind European standards for chicken welfare, as it moves to phase out controversial fast-growing breeds.

“Animals Aotearoa has released disturbing footage of fast-growing chickens to RNZ and is challenging all New Zealand's food companies to follow Domino's lead and change to slower-growing breeds, which can take around two weeks longer to reach full size.”

There’s a video in the link above, or if you’re not up for it, here are a few words:

“The footage, shot in New Zealand by Farmwatch and released by Animals Aotearoa, shows birds with splayed legs, unable to stand to reach food or water. Others struggle to walk, and some only take a few steps before sitting down again.”

Here’s a screenshot from the video:

You may be thinking, “Ah it’s ok, I only eat free-range chickens!

Well, here’s another screenshot from the same video:

Yep, this is what technically goes for “free-range”. No cages…

“Chicken farm staff walk through sheds daily to remove dead or dying chickens, but with around 40,000 chickens often in one shed it can be easy to miss some. Farmwatch, the group which captured the footage said they saw three to four chickens unable to walk in the part of the shed they filmed in.

"The chickens that can't reach food and water, unless they're lucky enough to be found by a worker and killed, they're going to die on the floor of the shed," said Macdonald.”

When it comes to KFC, don’t worry: the dirt and shit is wiped off before applying the Colonel’s secret recipe of herbs and spices.

I forgot to mention cannibalism. Since chickens are living, breathing, and social creatures, cramming them into dimly lit “free-range” hell-sheds like this brings out their antisocial behaviours, like cannibalism.

Not joking.

To temper this, New Zealand still allows debeaking, which means cutting off the sharp end of chickens’ beaks so that they can’t attack each other, or worse.

If you feel like some cool-aid and/or Soviet-style propaganda, try this from the Egg Producers Federation of NZ:

“Modern beak treatment is done in hatcheries by trained staff with special equipment. It is performed by laser and is painless, as similar to human fingernails, hens do not have nerves or a blood supply in the tip of their beaks.”

Such barbarism is already banned in Scandinavia, and the ban is gradually spreading across the “developed” world.

Meanwhile, in New Zealand:

“From 2022 onwards, it will be illegal for hens to be housed in battery cages in New Zealand. Colony cages have been approved as the a new caged housing system to replace battery cages.”

Colony cages are the same hell except you share your cage with a bigger bunch of chickens. Compared to this, the “free-range” chickens you see above are in a kind of paradise…

Another juicy titbit from the same Egg Producing folks:

“Cage farming methods have been scientifically shown to reduce the instance of disease and illness as birds are not as easily exposed to the pathogens often found on the ground or through increased contact with other hens or species.”

Disturbing.

Dominos sells industrial-style take-away pizzas that make Italians turn in their graves. Unlike KFC, Domino’s main ingredient in its “pizzas” is not chicken, but it’s good to see some slow change taking place for chickens subjected to these houses of horror.

If you’re in New Zealand and you don’t want to be a part of the torture chamber shit, and you still want to eat the occasional chicken, there are actually options that don’t oblige you to drag your soul through the poo. For instance, Bostock Brothers farm truly free-range chickens in the Hawkes Bay in the midst of an organic apple farm. There’s a great Country Calendar video on their operation:

Unfortunately, their chickens are still the fast-growing breed, but they currently don’t control the breeding part:

"Bostock Brothers is a chicken meat producer so we have no control over the genetics. The chicken breeders in New Zealand control the breeds we can access. Slow growing chicken breeds would be Bostock Brothers' choice and preference if this was an option available to us."

“He said the company supported any measures and regulation changes required to bring slow-growing chickens to the country.”

Good answer!

Their chickens cost between 22 and 27 NZ$ depending on their size. That’s about twice the price of a chicken that lived a truly shitty life with part of its beak cut off, stumbling around in its own shit in a dodgy badly-lit warehouse its whole miserable life. Or in a cage, with no stumbling anywhere at all.

If twenty-two bucks seems expensive, maybe try to eat a bit less chicken to offset the cost, add in some pasta or veggies, a tasty sauce, and you’re good to go!

Maybe give it a try and make the world a slightly better place?

Tickets now available for the Paris-Vienna night train!

The Paris-Vienna night train is back on track from Dec 13. Yay!

The French national railways have been sending me ads about it, like:

Free translation of the last line: “In one night, travel 1400 km between France and Austria, it’s a great deal.”

Indeed, there are in theory some cheap tickets going, starting at 30 euros:

However, that’s for seats, not beds. To paraphrase The Man in Seat 61: Seats in a night train are a false economy (unless you have amazing sleeping pills).

To get a feel for what the couchette and sleeper tickets will cost if you get then in advance, I checked out some dates in January 2021. For instance, I tried Friday 7 January for Paris to Vienna and all beds were already sold out! Gah! So then I tried Friday 21 January and a 4-bed couchette spot is currently 80 euros:

That’s a no-brainer if you don’t mind sleeping in the same space as three other people, given that you save the airfare and potentially a night in a hotel in Vienna (which is going to cost 60 euros for something dodgy and even more for something pleasant).

In the same train on Friday 21 January, a sleeper bed in a 3-bed cabin is currently 110 euros:

They’re not doing themselves any favours with that terrible photo though, making it look like you can barely get into the middle bed. To be honest, if I was going to be sharing, I’d pick a bed in the 4-bed couchette rather than in the 3-bed sleeping compartment on this train. Not a fan of the 3 beds on top of each other.

You can however privatise the 3-bed sleeping compartment and have it all to yourself for 160 euros, but that’s pretty steep, and you only get one breakfast included, not three:

Also, these are traditional sleeper cars. It’ll be quite interesting to see how the Austrian Railways price their newly-constructed sleepers with the private Japanese pod-like beds. Hopefully less than 160 euros!

If you want to get a feel for how the established operators between Paris and Vienna think about this new night train, do a Google search for “Nightjet Paris Vienna”:

Austrian airlines probably pays for ads like this by the savings it makes on its aviation fuel not being taxed.

Competition, eh?

New Zealand wasn't always full of cows

From Radio New Zealand and Stuff:

“For most of the 20th century, the white gold our farmers traded in was wool, boosted by related products – mutton, lamb, and so on.  

“But in the late 1980s, a market shift changed the face of our economy – and in many ways our landscape – utterly. 

“Agricultural subsidies were stripped away from New Zealand farmers,” says journalist Pete McKenzie. 

“They were exposed to the competitive pressures of the global market in a way they had never been before. 

“At the same time, the price of mutton, the price of wool, of lamb, started to decline.  

“One of the few agricultural products that stayed stable or grew was dairy. So thousands  of New Zealand’s farmers made the simple economic choice: they would shift away from the farming practices they’d had until then – largely balanced, but with a bit of a focus on sheep and other products of that sort – to intensified dairy.”

And that was terrible for the rivers and the land and the whole ‘clean-green’ vibe. Not to mention the methane emissions from belching cows, nor that farmers still hold massive debt from the switch to intensive dairy: 40 billion NZ$ (29 million US$).

And now as the planet warms and the oceans rise to meet New Zealand’s dairy-polluted rivers, things are a-changing again.

Given that dairy is going to have to start to de-intensify in New Zealand, farmers may need to switch some of their land to other uses in order to get by.

And that’s where things like growing oats for milk come in. Oat milk is perhaps the least-offensive milk alternative out there, unlike bitter almond milk and weird coconut milk (each to their own!), without the insane water needs (12 litres per almond).

Unsurprisingly, oat milk goes pretty well with porridge (lol).

Chris Wilkie, of Otis Oat Milk, at his rural Martinborough home. PIERS FULLER/STUFF

So, is oat milk one financial way to gradually move away from dairy?

“This is the complicated financial and environmental equation which Aotearoa must solve in order to reach our climate goals: how do we make reducing cattle numbers not only environmentally necessary, but financially possible? Southland is particularly vexed by this challenge. It might also be where an answer can be found, with an eclectic mix of farmers, officials, environmentalists and investors in the region betting on a new product as part of the solution to this climate and financial crisis: oat milk.”

The Southlanders have of course realised that oats are not exactly a cash crop these days:

“While serving in that role, it became clear to Gardyne that there was a significant problem facing both current oat farmers and those wishing to diversify away from industrialised dairy: the price of oats wasn’t high enough. Problematically, the existing oat market – for porridge and baking, among other things – had been met. Growing oat prices would require developing a whole new product. It was in this search for something new that Gardyne came across Chris Wilkie.”

And then…

“Just as Wilkie decided to do something to address intensive dairy farming, his friend Tim Ryan reached out. Ryan had spent years as a globetrotting advertising executive for Nike, but he had recently come home as well. Both Wilkie and Ryan had watched the rise of businesses like Impossible Foods, which was trying to cut American emissions by replacing beef burgers with ones made from plants or lab-grown meat.

“That resonated with me as I looked around the New Zealand countryside,” said Wilkie. “We have the world’s biggest dairy company. So that’s a logical place to focus on.”

“Ryan suggested they create an oat milk company. According to a University of Oxford study, producing a glass of dairy milk consumes at least nine times more land and produces at least three times more greenhouse gas emissions than any plant-based milk. Oat milk is one of the most environmentally friendly plant-based milks. Wilkie enthusiastically signed on and together they founded Otis.”

However, there was a catch:

“But these companies quickly found that their dreams of sustainable oat-based agriculture faced an enormous hurdle. Turning oats into oat milk requires a specialised, large-scale processing plant – something Aotearoa lacks. To create their product, Otis and All Good had to transport most of their oats to Sweden for processing and then import the resulting milk all the way back. (Boring processes its milk in Hawke’s Bay.) That global detour caused their greenhouse gas emissions to balloon beyond what they expected. Their costs have similarly jumped, meaning less of the purchase price goes to oat farmers.

“To connect environmentally conscious producers and consumers – and ensure oat farming was sufficiently viable that dairy farmers could convert to it – an oat milk processing plant in Aotearoa was necessary. Great South stepped up.”

So now there’s a plant under construction in Southland due for 2022-2023 that will be able to produce 40 million litres of oat milk a year. Excellent!

“The shift to plant-based milks also won’t happen overnight. According to Bruce Thorrold, who leads Dairy NZ’s New Systems and Competitiveness team, “growing oats is [still] quite a lot less profitable than milking cows”. He cited internal Dairy NZ figures which suggested that dairy farmers would make around $3000 in profit per hectare, while oat farmers would make just $1500. Over time, the profitability of dairy will be pushed down by costs like the Emission Trading Scheme’s carbon price (in recognition of dairy’s environmental impacts). The price of oats will also have to go up.

“But progress is being made. The construction of a new oat milk processing plant and the emergence of so many new oat milk companies is likely to make oat farming financially viable and help dairy farmers reach the 13 per cent reduction in cattle numbers necessary to achieving climate goals.”

Good stuff, Southland.

Australian mining baron decides to go 'green'

From the New York Times (gift article):

“As the sun set over the hills of the first mine that set him [Andrew Forrest] on a path to enormous wealth, he explained that Fortescue, the Australian company he founded, would no longer just extract and ship 180 million tons of iron ore, the raw material for steel. It would zero out its own carbon emissions and become a renewable energy powerhouse.”

When your last name is Forrest, it’s only a matter of time, right? I mean, look what happened to Isabella Tree.

Mr Forrest’s company is called Fortescue:

“Fortescue made $10.3 billion in profit last year by extracting iron ore and selling it mostly to Chinese steel makers. Along the way, the company burned through 700 million liters of diesel and released 2.2 million tons of greenhouse gases — more than some small countries.”

Yikes.

Fortescue plans to decarbonise by 2030, which is the kind of crazy deadline Elon Musk likes to set.

The Iron and Steel world emits around 7% of our emissions, more than cars.

As mentioned above, Fortescue ships the raw materials mostly to China, where they are likely turned into steel using electricity from burning coal. Which is bad. So…

“The most groundbreaking developments have come from a small room at the University of Western Australia, Dr. Forrest’s alma mater, where the company’s electrochemists have found a new route to what’s known as green iron and steel.

“Nearly 90 percent of the carbon released by the steel-making process comes from reducing it to “pig iron” in a blast furnace or smelter powered by fossil fuels. Fortescue’s engineers have built a miniature mill that they said could do the same thing with electrodes and a pressurized brew of metals and other materials. Sitting on a counter, it resembled a water heater crossed with an espresso machine.”

Sounds a bit out there, but Bill Gates is backing a competitor trying to do the same thing, so it’s probably legit.

Just be careful of the microchips in the steel.

I digress.

Fortescue is also on the way to running their mine trucks on hydrogen fuel. Check out the ladder on the truck that you need to climb just to get over the front wheel!

David Dare Parker for The New York Times.

Sounds like they’re still a way off getting a day’s worth of (explosive) hydrogen in there, but it’s a good challenge.

“Dr. Forrest is aware of the pressure and the doubt. When I asked whom he needed to convince to make sure his dream became reality, he answered quickly: “Everyone.”

“Miners, it turned out, were the easiest ones to persuade. At the sites I visited with Dr. Forrest, I interviewed dozens of workers and contractors. Nearly all expressed relief: Finally, they said, they could participate in a solution to climate change, getting past tired culture war politics.”

That’s definitely a positive.

Check out the full article, it’s pretty good!

The UK is on track to lead Europe into a regenerative farming revolution

Behind all the bitching and moaning about Brexit, there are good things bubbling under the surface in the UK:

“My farming friends think I’m nuts – I can’t remember when that hedge was cut last,” says Richard Thomas. Cutting is usually an annual event, but the bushy, 3-metre-wide hedgerow is now home to yellowhammers, his favourite birds.

“Thomas has laid about a kilometre of hedgerows in the past few years on his 250-hectare (617-acre) cattle and sheep farm in Herefordshire, where his family have farmed since 1893. But he would like to do more and hopes the fast-approaching revolution in the government’s use of the £3bn a year in farming subsidies is going to help.”

This is a hedgerow:

Hawthorn hedge by Chris Gomersall

You’ll know about hedgerows if you’ve read Isabella Tree’s fantastic book on the rewilding of the Knepp estate farm near Brighton (order it today, it’s great!). They’re biodiversity hotspots, havens for wildlife hiding out from other wildlife (including humans), and natural corridors that can be scurried through from A to B.

I digress.

The interesting point made above is that the UK has used Brexit to rethink agricultural subsidies by reorienting them towards farmers who want to bring parts of their farms ‘back to nature’, plant trees (or let wild trees flourish), and so forth. We’re talking three billion British pounds a year of hard cash.

This is usually the point in a blog post where it turns out that farmers are totally against such meddling and wish to be left in peace to degrade the soil as the like.

Well.

You and I would be well wrong on this one, in the UK at least. I did some falling off my chair at where this article and an accompanying article headed next.

“More and more people are seeing other farmers doing it [regenerative farming] and are happier for it,” said John Cherry, who founded Groundswell, the UK’s flagship event for regenerative agriculture, on his farm in Hertfordshire. “People may be getting a higher yield with conventional approaches, but it is costing them more too with all the inputs, so they are not making more money.”

“When Groundswell started six years ago, there were just a couple of hundred attenders. This year, more than 3,500 people turned up, including environment secretary George Eustice, who told the crowd that Brexit was a chance for the UK to lead the world on supporting regenerative agriculture. Under new subsidy plans announced by his department, farmers will be offered up to £70 per hectare to take up regenerative techniques, including mixed farming systems where crops are cultivated alongside livestock to help boost soil health.”

As well as shows like Groundswell, membership of regenerative farming groups has soared. The Landworkers Alliance, set up in 2014, represents more than 1,500 farmers and landworkers across the UK promoting more regenerative approaches to farming. While the Nature Friendly Farming Network and Pasture-fed Livestock Association have more than 1,500 farmer members between them.

This is all fantastic news.

Back to Richard Thomas:

“Thomas is one of 200 farmers taking part in a National Farmers Union’ programme to explore how the government’s aim of paying “public money for public goods” translates into action on the ground. Before Brexit, subsidies were largely based on simply how much land a farmer owned or rented. Over the next seven years, the goal is to switch the money to boosting wildlife, reducing floods and, crucially, storing the carbon emissions driving the climate crisis in soils and trees.”

How many farmers are truly on board with giving it a go in the UK? 20% 50%?

“Farmers say they are up for the challenge, according to a new NFU survey of 400 randomly chosen members. It found that 84% of farmers were interested in applying for the environmental land management schemes (ELMs) that the government will use to channel public money into public goods.”

Fantastic.

Before I go, today’s recommendation: check out the film, The Biggest Little Farm about the first seven years of a regenerative farm being started from literally barren earth in California. You can rent it on Google Play for peanuts; here’s the trailer:

Sending off the duck army to war with the snails was a personal highlight!

Crazy white paint that cools buildings

From USA Today:

“The whitest paint in the world has been created in a lab at Purdue University, a paint so white that it could eventually reduce or even eliminate the need for air conditioning, scientists say.

“The paint has now made it into the Guinness World Records book as the whitest ever made.”

It’s even whiter than the KKK Grand Wizard’s butt cheeks.

“The idea was to make a paint that would reflect sunlight away from a building, researchers said.

“Making this paint really reflective, however, also made it really white, according to Purdue University. The paint reflects 98.1% of solar radiation while also emitting infrared heat. Because the paint absorbs less heat from the sun than it emits, a surface coated with this paint is cooled below the surrounding temperature without consuming power.”

“Using this new paint to cover a roof area of about 1,000 square feet could result in a cooling power of 10 kilowatts. “That’s more powerful than the air conditioners used by most houses,” Ruan said.”

Crazy!

Would it be a digression to suggest that the advert served to me in the article took the text “white house”, looked for ads with white houses, and then displayed one in case I was in the market for a white house?

Can’t for the life of me think why google is trying to make me buy wine though.

It’s a mystery!

[Cover photo: PURDUE UNIVERSITY/JOHN UNDERWOOD]

Used solar panels are powering the developing world

From Bloomberg:

“Across the developing world, homeowners, farmers, and businesses are turning to cheap, secondhand solar to fill power gaps left by governments and utilities. To meet that demand, businesses ranging from individual sellers on Facebook Marketplace to specialized brokerages are getting into the trade. Earlier this month, Marubeni Corp., one of Japan’s largest trading houses, announced that it’s establishing a blockchain-based market for such panels. Collectively, these businesses will likely play a crucial role in bringing renewable energy to the world’s emerging markets — and keeping high-tech waste out of the trash.”

Go on.

“In developed countries, recycling — not reuse and resale — tends to be the kneejerk response to managing such waste. But there are two problems with recycling unwanted solar panels. First, doing so is far costlier than simply landfilling them. Second, waste panels often aren’t waste; they’re just degraded by time in the sun or less efficient than newer models. They may not be good enough for San Francisco homeowners and cutting-edge utilities, but they work perfectly well for anyone in a sunny climate in need of stable, off-grid power who doesn’t want to pay full price.”

Things move fast.

“Between 2010 and 2019, the number of people living without electricity declined from 1.2 billion to 759 million worldwide. Some of that gap was closed by new power lines and other transmission facilities. But most of it was achieved by installing small solar systems designed to power a village, farm or even a single home. As of last year, 420 million people got their electricity from off-grid solar systems. By 2030, according to the World Bank, that number could nearly double.”

Good news all round.

Meet the Meat: how overall food emissions are driven by eating animals

From the Guardian:

“The global production of food is responsible for a third of all planet-heating gases emitted by human activity, with the use of animals for meat causing twice the pollution of producing plant-based foods, a major new study has found.”

It’s already bad enough that producing food ‘in general’ is the cause of 1/3 of our emissions.

The fact that 2/3 of this 1/3 comes from eating animals, even though we usually eat animals well decorated (sides of vegetables, rice, pasta…) is what is known in the industry as ‘food for thought’.

“The use of cows, pigs and other animals for food, as well as livestock feed, is responsible for 57% of all food production emissions, the research found, with 29% coming from the cultivation of plant-based foods. The rest comes from other uses of land, such as for cotton or rubber. Beef alone accounts for a quarter of emissions produced by raising and growing food.”

The low-hanging ‘fruit’ here is not hard to spot:

Perhaps the craziest fact from the report is that more than half of all cropland is used to grow food for the animals we eat.

The second craziest fact:

“To produce 1kg of wheat, 2.5kg of greenhouse gases are emitted. A single kilo of beef, meanwhile, creates 70kg of emissions.”

A word from one of the authors of the report:

“I’m a strict vegetarian and part of the motivation for this study was to find out my own carbon footprint, but it’s not our intention to force people to change their diets,” said Jain. “A lot of this comes down to personal choice. You can’t just impose your views on others. But if people are concerned about climate change, they should seriously consider changing their dietary habits.”

I find one way to move in this direction is to take a look in the mirror, and slowly but surely encode the fact that you (and I) are part of nature, not above it.

Accepting this perhaps scary fact might be the first step on a new path.

A feedlot in Colarado. It can hold 98,000 cattle. Photo credit: Jim West/Alamy Stock Photo

Swedish concrete

There are now 593 interesting newspaper articles I haven’t talked about in my Climate folder in Gmail.

That is probably too many. They come too fast these days.

Let’s get that number down to 592.

It’s from Le Monde (it’s in French but pop it into Chrome and then automatically translate it):

Sweden is currently undergoing a cement crisis because the domestic limestone quarry that most of their raw material for cement comes from has been refused ongoing environmental permits from the appeals courts, including the Swedish Supreme Court!

This one quarry provides 75% of Sweden’s cement needs.

This one quarry employs 430 people.

Which could of course have follow-on effects on anyone whose job involves building buildings.

One question I have: Will Sweden simply import limestone from other countries and try to retain its current level of concrete-based construction?

Or will this be an accelerator in moving to other ways of building (e.g., using cross-laminated wood techniques to build taller buildings—it’s not like Sweden is short of trees or anything. Umm, IKEA anyone?), or simply building less?

It’s fascinating to me that European countries with almost flat population levels still appear to need to build so many buildings with concrete every year. Sweden’s population growth is barely above zero.

Slite quarry on Gotland Island in the Baltic sea. ALAMY STOCK PHOTO/HEMIS.FR

An adventure by train from Krakow to Paris!

Just back from three chilled-out days on the rails: 8 trains, 1 bus, one missed train (on purpose!), a derailing (freight train up ahead), and to top it all off, a spooky 3 am arrival at Paris Gare de l’Est station due to the derailing incident!

If you’re a psychopath, you can actually do Krakow to Paris by train in one day. If you like getting up at 4am, that is:

Screenshot 2021-08-28 at 15.31.15.png

I am not a psychopath. And also, 267€ !!

Yeah Nah.

Here’s the map of the three days/two nights route I took:

europemap.jpg

Photos and juicy details of the trip below.

————————————————————

DAY 1

Krakow to Wroclaw 8:35 - 12:02 10

PXL_20210824_062315617.jpg

The first train went all the way to Hel! I just took it to Wroclaw, half way to the German border. Grey sky. Poland magnificently green, magnificently flat, and magnificently boring on this stretch. The train stopped about 6000 times at villages you’ve never heard of. But the ticket was cheap as chips. Had a seat in a 6-person compartment with a sliding glass door rather than open plan. These are still the norm in much of the East. Love them. Much better for striking up conversation.

train2.jpg

Old overgrown platforms on arrival at Wroclaw station.

train3.jpg

And a hint or two that Wroclaw was called Breslau (i.e., it was full of Germans) before WWII.

Wroclaw - Zgorzelec 12:36 - 14:55 6

Cheap and cheerful local train. Could tune out the noise because I don’t speak much Polish.

No hills on this stretch of Poland either. Green and featureless. A bit dull.

train4.jpg

The marvellous ruin of the train station building at Zgorzelec town centre. Love it!

Zgorzelec is on the German border; across the river it’s Görlitz in Germany. In case you get confused, there are helpful posts:

train5.jpg

Poland looking across to Görlitz.

train10.jpg

Germany looking across to Zgorzelec.

train7.jpg

Random dude standing with one foot in both countries.

Both sides of the river used to part of Germany. But: WWII.

The Polish side is nothing to write home about, but Görlitz is a hidden gem. It wasn’t bombed during the war so it’s all preserved like a kind of miniature Prague, cobblestoned with fantastic Baroque architecture and retro trams. Not to mention 4000 listed buildings, for a population of only 50,000!

train6.jpg

And maybe a hundred tourists or so. Fantastic.

train9.jpg

See how empty it is! Suck on that, Prague tourist hordes!

Hollywood has certainly heard of Görlitz though: movies filmed here include The Grand Budapest Hotel, Inglorious Basterds, The Monuments Men, and The Reader.

train11.jpg

A sunset beer in Poland looking over towards Görlitz.

train12.jpg

And why not a nightcap back over the border in Görlitz?

I stayed overnight at the Penjonat Miejski in Zgorzelec (48€).

————————————————————

DAY 2

Zgorzelec - Dresden 8:00 - 9:24 13

The same ticket costs around 25€ if you buy it on the German side of the border!

Even better, I got on the train at Görlitz, not Zgorzelec, for one last wander through the pretty streets of the town.

A cool wind pushed through a mostly sunny day across agricultural land dotted with small hills in eastern Germany. Cows and sheep to be seen. A smoother train track on the German side. Better pastries too.

train13.jpg

A beautiful modern building in Dresden, a city infamously fire-bombed by Britain during WWII. (See: Kurt Vonnegut’s Slaughterhouse-Five for a ‘fictional’ portrayal of events.)

train18.jpg

A lot of the old town is reconstructed, but feels like it’s missing a soul.

train17.jpg

In the old town.

train16.jpg

Some pretty flower gardens though.

train14.jpg

And a lot of construction going on.

And way too many tourists milling around like camera zombies. Ugh.

Gorlitz was like fifty times prettier, but not the same recent dramatic history, I guess.

train15.jpg

You can take a boat to the Czech border from Dresden! Good to know for next time!

train19.jpg

You can also vote for an extreme-right-wing party in the upcoming German elections if you’re a fan of factory-farmed pigs.

Dresden - Prague 13:10 - 15:36 & Prague - Cheb 16:43 - 19:26 24

I took the train to Prague because it follows the scenic Elbe river and also because it has a restaurant car!

Unfortunately, my lunch ended up looking like this:

train20.jpg

I think I got all three major food groups in there. Correct me if I’m wrong.

train21.jpg

Arriving at Prague, I found out why the restaurant car had armed guards: the German foreign minister had privatised it for lunch on his way to Prague. This was the media circus at Prague central station.

train23.jpg

Had one hour and seven minutes between trains in Prague, so I rushed up the Vinohrady hill behind the station for a quick hipster coffee in an old haunt.

The sweaty armpits were worth it.

Started cursing myself for not staying overnight in Prague, the beauty of all beauties.

Then ran for my next train.

This was express train to the lovely village of Cheb just before the German border (a different part of the border!).

The A/C wasn’t working and the train was cookin’ hot, full, and delayed half an hour to boot.

Gradually the train emptied out as we crossed the Czech Republic westwards. Another 6-seat compartment, which means people talk to each other, which—as you know—I love. Even if one person is Japanese, another Czech, and another is me, and zero languages in common!

The Japanese girl in question did not even speak ONE word of English, which was amazing to experience in 2021. I spoke broken Polish to the Czech lady and we pretended to understand each other. It was fun!

Stayed the night in Cheb at Pension U Vlčků (38€), a pretty nice place except for the construction works somewhere in the building at 7:30 am that were strong enough to shake me awake.

————————————————————

DAY 3

Cheb - Nuremberg 9:36 - 11:22 & Nuremberg - Frankfurt 12:57 - 15:04 16

train24.jpg

Cheb station in the early morning. A German regional train ready to ferry me back into Germany. Did you spot how four hours of German train cost was only going to cost me 16€ ? There’s a trick to it if you’re coming from the Czech republic. You simply add a connection through (or start at) Cheb and make your booking on the Czech train website, not the German one. The same trip usually costs 3x as much if you book it on the German website.

Thanks to the Man in Seat 61 for this tip.

There were unexpected track repairs on the first segment.

train25.jpg

Which meant an ignoble half-hour bus ride between two towns. Ugh, buses!

train27.jpg

Then back onto the train to Nuremberg. Two of my favourite things in this photo. See if you can spot them.

The train got in late to Nuremberg. It wasn’t too late to miss my connection but I had planned lunch in Nuremberg. The conductor told me I could chill out in Nuremberg, have my lunch, and then catch a later train to Frankfurt.

Done!

I went back to my favourite coffee shop in Nuremberg, The Sweet Vegan.

train26.jpg

Her coffee is the best between Paris and Krakow, and her chocolaty-cinnamonny pastry is damn good.

The next train—to Frankfurt—was an uneventful two hours, especially as I didn’t test the conductor on whether I truly could take this (later) train; I pretended I’d already had my ticket checked.

Lol.

Three hours to kill in Frankfurt before the early evening train to Paris. Outside Frankfurt main station is pure human desolation: a sprawling uncontrolled drug addiction zone which is actually scary to walk through. So many fucked up people stumbling around looking dazed, walking quickly towards you or past you, others yelling at each other, rubbish everywhere, and the feeling that someone might charge you with a knife at any moment. In the middle of the afternoon!

Meanwhile a small terrace house in the suburbs of Frankfurt now costs in the millions.

I ran down the clock at an art gallery—ironically for free—sponsored by a big German bank.

train29.jpg

This was the bank. It was a lovely sunny afternoon in a noisy and dodgy downtown Frankfurt.

train30.jpg

And the same photo, looking down.

Time to grab some food, avoid the knives, and hop on the last train to Paris!

Frankfurt - Paris 18:56 - 22:52 55 in First Class

The first thing I saw when I got on the train:

train31.jpg

This guy should not be on a train, let alone in First Class. I hesitated about whether to show him my pocket-knife, but finally decided to let it pass.

train32.jpg

Night falls on the high-speed train.

train33.jpg

Totally caning it.

Then shit happened. About 100 km into the French leg of the trip, a freight train derailed up ahead, and we were stopped for an hour on the tracks. The decision was made to high-speed us back in the other direction—towards Germany!—then hook into the slow-train tracks from Metz all the way back to Paris.

Estimated time of arrival: 3am!

So, that happened. I got up, brushed my teeth, and went to bed in my seat in the almost empty wagon. Thanks to a combination of suspicious Sicilian and spicy Czech wine, I had a decent four hour sleep and was quite surprised to wake up at the Gare de l’Est in Paris.

At 3 am!

train34.jpg

Dazed passengers leaving the Gare de l’Est with a police escort.

train35.jpg

Heading home, one last goodbye to the ICE train sitting all on its lonesome in an empty Gare de l’Est.

————————————————————

Conclusions

Train tickets: 124€ but with a 75% refund of the 55€ for the delay in the final train, so finally only 83€ overall (from Krakow to Paris!)

Hotels: 85€

Three days’ food and beverages: 75€

Total: 243€

Would I do it again? Yes! But…

This trip can be done easily in two days/one night. I added the extra day to fit in the Dresden-Prague segment for the restaurant car by the river. That was an unlucky mistake.

Probably the most civilised way to do it would be the direct Krakow - Berlin train: 10:15 - 17:16 (tickets starting at around 35€) with plenty of time for an evening in Berlin, then the next day: Berlin - Paris with a change in Frankfurt (or Mannheim/Karlsruhe) where you could leave a couple of hours between connections to go for a wander, stretch your legs, have lunch, etc. This would break up your day into two segments of about 4 hours travel in nice high-speed trains, with a big break in the middle. Easy peasy! Unless a freight train derails your plans.

If you’re in even more of a hurry, you can take the night train from Krakow to Berlin, then day trains through to Paris. And if you’re a psychopath, go back to the top of this page and check out the timetable!

Shutting down the worst 5% of the world's power plants would cut electricity's carbon emissions by 75%

How’s that for a headline!

From ARS TECHNICA:

“The world seems to be simultaneously on fire and flooding, and the latest expert report indicates that we've just about run out of time to avoid even more severe climate change. All of that should have us looking for ways to cut carbon emissions as quickly and economically as possible.

“Some good news in that regard came via the recent release of a paper that looks at how much each power plant contributes to global emissions. The study finds that many countries have many power plants that emit carbon dioxide at rates well above either the national or global average. Shutting down the worst 5 percent of this list would immediately wipe out about 75 percent of the carbon emissions produced by electricity generation.”

More specifics:

“The authors looked at how much of a country's pollution was produced by the worst 5 percent when all of the country's power plants were ranked by carbon emissions. In China, the worst 5 percent accounted for roughly a quarter of the country's total emissions. In the US, the worst 5 percent of plants produced about 75 percent of the power sector's carbon emissions. South Korea had similar numbers, while Australia, Germany, and Japan all saw their worst 5 percent of plants account for roughly 90 percent of the carbon emissions from their power sector.”

Fascinating.

It seems like a no-brainer, really, to shut these down and make do with the rest.

But this is humanity we’re talking about.

Clearly, it wouldn’t be easy to just shut down the worst on the list just like that.

So the authors proposed other options:

“The big winner is carbon capture and storage. Outfitting the worst of the plants with a capture system that was 85 percent efficient would cut global power sector emissions in half and total global emissions by 20 percent. Countries like Australia and Germany would see their power sector emissions drop by over 75 percent.

“Overall, these are massive gains, considering that it's not unreasonable to think that the modifications could be done in less than a decade. And they show the clear value of targeting the easiest wins when it comes to lowering emissions. That function could be accomplished by governmental planning, but placing a significant price on carbon could also force the private sector to plan based on emissions efficiency—something it currently has little or no incentive to do in many countries.”

If there’s a will, there’s a way.

[Cover photo by Andreas Felske on Unsplash]

The Austrians just ordered TWENTY more full night train sets!

You may recall my minor obsession with Austrian night trains.

The Austrians already ordered a dozen fancy new train sets from Siemens, which are being built as we speak. These have totally redesigned interiors including some wagons with Japanese Pod Hotel-like cabins, like this:

And now there are twenty more train sets on the way by 2025!

Their night train network is already impressive, and they already run most of the night trains that pass through Germany too, so another twenty train sets gets them ready for future European night train domination.

Also, their Paris-Vienna night train will be back in action in December this year! Yeah!

By the way, here’s a map of their current network:

It’s starting to look good by night in Europe. Good work, Austria!

Three interconnected climate stories from New Zealand

You did well if you missed the front page semi-apocalyptic warnings across all media yesterday about the future of humanity as the latest IPCC report came out.

One Guardian headline was: “IPCC report shows possible loss of entire countries within the century.”

And that was one of the more chilled-out headlines.

Simultaneously, New Zealand was targeted by a Greta tweet:

New Zealand’s prime minister, stuck between Greta and The Farmers, didn’t have much space to work with on this one, though she did manage to babble some meaningless crap to try and ease the story out of everyone’s worry zone for a little while:

"We are, obviously, in the process now of just having received our climate commission report of responding to what is a significant piece of work in order to plan our emission reductions and our carbon budgets," she said.

"It would be unfair to judge New Zealand based on what essentially were targets that were set some time ago when we are now undertaking an incredibly heavy piece of work to lift our ambition and lift our emissions reductions."

It’s like reading a Trump quote, but with grammar.

The Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor managed to say nearly nothing at all in the most complicated way possible too:

“Agricultural emissions were not just from cows, they were also from waste, he said, and he "absolutely" agreed with the argument that cutting food production in New Zealand may simply move it to overseas industries that were less sustainable.”

This weird obsession with the ‘magical’ sustainability of NZ agriculture compared to other countries has to be nipped at the bud for the lie it is. It’s bollocks!

That was story number one.

Story number two from RNZ:

“A Southland farmer already in mediation over land clearing is now under investigation after being accused of trying to drain a wetland.”

Here are the drains:

This douche—who is unlikely to ever feature in Fonterra’s greenwashing ads that the NZ Herald runs as trick articles—is already infamous for illegally clearing 800 hectares of native Manuka trees on his land to make room for grass to feed cows.

And finally, story number 3, also from RNZ, entitled: ‘Growing SUV popularity coincides with surge in vehicle emissions.’

“New Zealanders are driving bigger cars, travelling greater distances, and emitting more carbon dioxide as they go.

“In the last five years, private transport emissions have grown much faster than dairy and manufacturing sector emissions.

“After years of the Toyota Corolla taking the number one spot, the top four most popular new passenger cars last year were all SUVs, or sports utility vehicles - Toyota Rav 4, Kia Sportage, Kia Seltos, and Mazda CX-5.”

I think it would be safe to say from the above evidence that NZ as a whole—its politicians, farmers, and people—has decided to stick its head in the sand for a little while longer yet.

One has to wonder what the tipping point will be before real action happens. Will there have to be an apocalyptic flood of half the country, a forest fire taking out one of NZ’s wooden house cities, or something worse even, before real action is taken?

Probably!

When the shit hits YOUR fan

“Climate inaction in the rich world was never really about denial. Belgians and Germans knew climate change was real; they just thought poorer countries would bear the brunt of it. And up until recently, they were right.”

And so goes Naomi Klein as she explains how even people in wealthy countries are running out of places to hide. It’s a great 5-minute read, highly recommended!

Some more quotes from her article:

  • “As for the idea that Californians should move north to escape fire, that dream has obviously gone up in flames. Last summer, deadly wildfires forced evacuations just east of Portland, Oregon, and as I write, smoke from the state’s Bootleg fire is contributing to the plume that blotted out the sun as far away as New York City. So, no, Oregon is not safe. New York is not safe. Germany is not safe. Nowhere that imagined itself safe is safe.”

  • “…something dramatic is changing in public perception: a dropping away of the fantasy of safety in the wealthier parts of the world, as well as the beginnings of cracks in the faith that money and technology will find solutions just in the nick of time.”

  • “As water scientist Peter Gleick recently wrote, we are seeing the emergence of “two classes of refugees: those with the freedom and financial resources to try, for a while at least, to flee from growing threats in advance, and those who will be left behind to suffer the consequences in the form of illness, death and destruction.”

  • “In this summer of fires and floods, it appears to be dawning on many that even this sinister form of climate apartheid is likely an illusion for all but the ultra-rich […] As the New York Times echoed in an ominous headline overlaid on a photograph of a burning building: “No one is safe.” We are all trapped in this crisis — whether under that relentless pall of smoke, or in a heat that hits like a physical wall, or under rains and winds that will not stop.”

There’s no beating about the burning bush with Naomi.

[Cover photo: A helicopter prepares to make a water drop as smoke billows along the Fraser River Valley near Lytton, British Columbia, Canada, on July 2, 2021. Photo: James MacDonald/Bloomberg via Getty Images]

When the insects go, we go

Everything you ever wanted to know about insects and their brutal drop in numbers darkly spelled out in an in-depth Guardian article by biologist Dave Goulson.

Some juicy titbits for lazy mofos:

  • “Estimates vary and are imprecise, but it seems likely that insects have declined in abundance by 75% or more since I was five years old.” (he was born in 1965)

  • “Approximately three-quarters of the crop types we grow also require pollination by insects, and if the bulk of plant species could no longer set seed and died out, then every community on land would be profoundly altered and impoverished, given that plants are the basis of every food chain.”

  • “In total, the ecosystem services provided by insects are estimated to be worth at least $57bn a year in the US alone, although this is a pretty meaningless calculation since, as EO Wilson once said, without insects “the environment would collapse into chaos” and billions would starve.”

  • In the UK: “Butterflies of the “wider countryside” – common species found in farmland, gardens and so on, such as meadow browns and peacocks – fell in abundance by 46% between 1976 and 2017.”

  • One of the reasons bird numbers are in decline is that lots of birds feast on—wait for it—insects. e.g,: “In England, populations of the spotted flycatcher fell by 93% between 1967 and 2016.”

  • Other UK bird examples: “Other once-common insectivores have suffered similarly, including the grey partridge (-92%), nightingale (-93%) and cuckoo (-77%). The red-backed shrike, a specialist predator of large insects, went extinct in the UK in the 1990s.”

What to do?

  • “We must transform our food system. Growing and transporting food so that we all have something to eat is the most fundamental of human activities. The way we do it has profound impacts on our own welfare, and on the environment, so it is surely worth investing in getting it right. There is an urgent need to overhaul the current system, which is failing us in multiple ways. We could have a vibrant farming sector, employing many more people, and focused on sustainable production of healthy food, looking after soil health and supporting biodiversity.”

  • “We need to green our urban areas. Imagine green cities filled with trees, vegetable gardens, ponds and wild flowers squeezed into every available space – in our gardens, city parks, allotments, cemeteries, on road verges, railway cuttings and roundabouts – and all free from pesticides.”

  • “Government organisations responsible for wildlife conservation, such as Natural England, should be properly funded, yet have seen huge budget cuts in recent years. Monitoring schemes and research into understanding the causes of insect declines must also be properly government-funded.”

It’s not like there’s a shortage of solutions or anything. Just the will to get kickin’.

Political, societal, and individual.

[Cover photo: A leafcutter bee in Hertfordshire. Photograph: Nature Picture Library/Alamy]

There's been some crazy weather lately

As you may have noticed, there’s some good ole’ fashion crazy weather-n-shit happening to various rich countries at the moment: heatwaves (three and a fourth on the way for the Western US and Canada), epic fires in California and Siberia, barely believable temperature records, flooding across half of Europe.

Good times, good times.

Since it’s happening to rich countries though, it’s much more noticeable because rich-country journalists cover it, and rich-country politicians pledge to sell their balls to fix it (or something, I tune out), and the acceleration towards that wall we’re heading for picks up some more speed.

Some Bill McKibbon quotes to get you through a crazy climate week:

“Having had almost thirty-five years to come to terms with climate change, I’m used to the contours of our dilemma. Even so, the past two weeks have frightened me, both for what feels like a rapid acceleration in the pace of the planet’s heating…”

“The temperature in Lytton, British Columbia, hit a hundred and twenty-one degrees—the highest ever measured in Canada—and, the next day, most of Lytton burned to the ground, in one of a series of increasingly out-of-control wildfires. Almost five hundred people died in British Columbia in the course of five days, “compared with an average of one hundred sixty-five in normal times,” and more than a billion sea creatures may have perished in the coastal waters.”

Oh, and get ready to freak out about feedback loops as this decade advances:

“Less obvious, and more scary, is the possibility that the heat may be part of a vicious feedback loop that drives temperatures ever higher. “This is by far the largest jump in the record I have ever seen,” Friederike Otto, the associate director of the Environmental Change Institute at the University of Oxford, told the Guardian. “We should definitely not expect heatwaves to behave as they have in the past.”

Basically, take your scary climate model and pretend that’s the best-case scenario if some bad heat loops get a kickin’.

One small step in a better direction:

“The University of Calgary has suspended its bachelor’s program in oil-and-gas engineering. An official said that the school decided that “we need to give students a chance to learn about what geothermal means, what hydrogen energy means, wind and solar, and then package that together, so when students graduate from here, they are actually stronger and will be able to better perform once they go into whichever segment of the energy industry that they end up.”

And a petition many of you will surely get behind in about a millisecond:

“A petition campaign for a four-day workweek is up and running, driven in part by a British study showing that it could cut carbon emissions from the U.K. by twenty-one per cent.”

Bill McKibben’s New Yorker newsletter is a treasure trove. Sign up (for free) for it here.

[Cover photo: Erdorf, Germany. Harald Tittel/dpa via AP]

Canadian inferno: northern heat exceeds worst-case climate models

From the Guardian:

“Shocked climate scientists are wondering how even worst-case scenarios failed to predict such furnace-like conditions so far north.”

Very little shocks climate scientists these days.

Johan Rockström, the director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, said the recent extreme weather anomalies were not represented in global computer models that are used to project how the world might change with more emissions. The fear is that weather systems might be more frequently blocked as a result of human emissions. “It is a risk – of a serious regional weather impact triggered by global warming – that we have underestimated so far,” he said.”

It’s pretty clear the Earth’s climate is trending along with the worst-case climate models, if not worse.

“More people in more countries are feeling that their weather belongs to another part of the world. Across the border, in Washington state, the maximum heat measured at Olympia and Quillayute was 6C higher than the previous all-time record, according to the Weather Prediction Centre. In Oregon, the town of Salem hit 47C, smashing the previous record by 9C. Several areas of California and Idaho also saw new highs.

“The previous week, northern Europe and Russia also sweltered in an unprecedented heat bubble. June records were broken in Moscow (34.8C), Helsinki (31.7C), Belarus (35.7C) and Estonia (34.6C).”

Southern Spain is on target for 47°C this week. And then we get to the coldest inhabited place on Earth, which is not Canada, it turns out:

“Further east, Siberia experienced an early heatwave that helped to reduce the amount of sea ice in the Laptev Sea to a record low for the time of year. The town of Oymyakon, Russia, widely considered to be the coldest inhabited place on Earth, was hotter (31.6C) than it has ever been in June.”

And there’s another heatwave on the way for the western US this week.

I don’t know about you, but I sniff a smoky trend here.

[Cover photo: Near Lytton, British Columbia last week. Canadian Press/Rex/Shutterstock]